tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8596392630845692906.post7912839167110202867..comments2022-11-29T07:59:29.471-08:00Comments on ...Shall we not Revenge?: BB32: Against Your WillTruen1ghthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14658827203515387622noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8596392630845692906.post-49588339658255701632012-02-05T03:09:51.211-08:002012-02-05T03:09:51.211-08:00Hah, indeed proof that too much EVE can cause spli...Hah, indeed proof that too much EVE can cause split-personality disorders.<br /><br />That said, I think your argument of a "nursery slope" for the benefit of new subcriber nurturing has merit, and your counter to the "undock is PvP flag" argument is solid too. CCP *doesn'* arbitrarily approve.<br /><br />I certainly can't see how protecting those who participate in entry-level missions or similar low-reward activities would have any impact on those who pout and threaten to unsub if that were to occur.Mat Westhorpehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08553980835026556794noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8596392630845692906.post-88292096102861078902012-01-19T06:57:55.165-08:002012-01-19T06:57:55.165-08:00My first thought to reading this was that someone ...My first thought to reading this was that someone had hacked your account. True wanting to have PVP free zones, the same True who sat with me in a WH as we tried to lure some guys (later good corpmates and friends) into an ambush specifically to kill them? True who once flew through NPC navy fire to kill some wartargets? That True??? But I have to admit I read the whole thing and I can see what you are saying and why you said it. Having 1.0 systems free of all PVP would probably work really well, they have F**k all in resources anyways so if the noobs want something better they have to risk pvp to get it.<br /><br />Ranger GamaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com